Friday, February 10, 2006

Jane Doe Identified

A woman known only as Jane Doe was found murdered December 9, 1999 in the Greenbelt Forest Preserve. She had been brutalized prior to her death. The men involved in her death were caught, charged, and either convicted or pled guilty. Despite multiple attempts to identify her , both locally and nationally, she continued to be known only as Jane Doe. Jane Doe waited for her identity and the dignity that comes from being a person again, not just Jane Doe. Jane Doe was finally given a dignified burial July 29, 2005 (having remained in the freezer in the Corner's Office since her death, before I took office).

Early this week an Investigator from Racine County, Wisconsin checking for leads to identify a murder victim killed in their county in 1999 came across a reference to an individual missing from Carpentersville since 1999. This Investigator, Eileen Reilly, knew of our Jane Doe because of her investigating her murdered Jane Doe and called the Lake County Major Crimes Task Force with information that at least in general terms (age in early 30s, height less than 5 foot, etc) the missing woman from Carpentersville seemed similar to our Jane Doe. That information was than shared with our office (Lake County Coroner’s Office). The photo on the Charley Project website really bore limited similarity to our Jane Doe, so while we had some hope we remained uncertain.

When our personnel contacted the Carpentersville Police Department we were told they had a better picture and dental records of their missing woman. Our Chief Deputy, Steve Newton, conferred with Carpentersville Police on Wednesday and took possession of the photo and dental records. That photo looked much more like our Jane Doe would have looked in life. The dental records were an obvious match, assisted by our consulting Forensic Odontologists, Russell Schneider, DDS and Carl Hagstrom, DDS. Jane Doe was finally found to be Mary Kate Sunderlin-Chamizo, a woman previously living in Carpentersville, IL reported as a missing person in October 2000, but missing since September 1999. Mary Kate Sunderlin would have been 41 this year.

We have talked with her family and let them know that their sister has been found albeit deceased. They have expressed their grief at their loss, their relief that their waiting and wondering is over, and their appreciation that someone cared enough to arrange for a proper burial for Mary Kate.

5 comments:

Bill W. said...

Saw you today on TV down here in Chicagoland, (Mount Prospect). I yelled to the wife "The Coroner is on, the Coroner is on TV." The wife responded, "New program?" Women, I don't know. Thanks for the insight into "Coronerism." Keep up the fine work Doc, I certainly enjoy reading. Thanks.

A Faithful Reader
Bill W.
MSgt, USAF, Retired

S.T.G. said...

Doctor Keller,

I believe that you are doing a great job! You of few people would say what is truly going on in our society these days. And I am not saying this as a concerned parent, but as a teenager(and a friend of your daughter). And I just wanted to thank you for speaking the truth about what is going on in society and to keep up with the great job!

S.T.G.

Anonymous said...

You don't have many comments for having just been in the Trib yesterday...

Cara said...

Dr. Keller,
This is the first time I've read your blog, although I clipped out the "Coroner starts blog" article some time ago. I just want to say that I find what you do to be thuroughly engrossing, and I think that it's good that you write about your work. I like hearing stories where -although it is never good when someone dies- the decedent is properly taken care of and identified, even if it be years later. Thanks for posting this. I appreciate that you post the real way things happen, versus a somewhat glamourized episode of CSI. Your blog has really interested me, and I know I'll be back to read more.

Anonymous said...

Hi: I was looking for information on San Diego cosmetic dentist and can upon your site. I'm working on a site about San Diego & Tijuana dentists and looking for any good facts that I might be able to incorporate into my site to really provide an in-depth information source. After reading your Blog, I found it interesting, but, it wasn't what I was looking for. Well I'm off again in search for some good info.